+- BLOG imu (https://institutomexicanodeultrasonido.com.mx/blog)
+-- Foro: Mi Especialidad (https://institutomexicanodeultrasonido.com.mx/blog/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Foro: Mi Diplomado (https://institutomexicanodeultrasonido.com.mx/blog/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Tema: single ladies release date (/showthread.php?tid=12861)
single ladies release date - franklinkelsey5 - 01-11-2025
Hello, visitor!
Article about single ladies release date:
Released 8 October 2008 on Music World (catalog no. 88697 47503 2, CD). Genres: Dance-Pop.
>> ENTER THE SITE <<
Featured peformers: Tricky Stewart (writer), The-Dream (writer), Kuk Harrell (writer), Beyoncé (writer, executive producer), Tom Coyne (mastering engineer), Matthew Knowles (executive producer). Single ladies release date. Beyonce's single: Single Ladies is one of the worst examples of a song being one of the best songs of all time. This is the type of song to be so absolutely good that is baffles the public into thinking the song is bad. The goodness of Beyonce professing that she is single and that the ladies need to holler that over and over again transforms that world's mind into two thought processes. One group is the full of the people who believe this song is christ risen. This is the track that Beyonce stans kneel down and pray before. They create statues of this music video, animations of every frame, curating their own perspectives of this absolute masterpiece. These people are full of love and extremely happy individuals. They have families, lovers, and live a life of extreme fulfillments and absolute joy. Meanwhile, we got the other group. Now normally, we wouldn't talk about them, and that's why I'm not going to. You could refer to them as Beyonce Haters, but I'm going to call them gonger bongers. Now, gonger bongers are not very good at describing their thoughts on music. Whenever a big pop song gets enormous, usually they grab their thesaurus and start building this exquisite apartment housing the biggest and most extravagant vocabulary possible. The other building that may be constructed could be full of metaphors, simile, and literary transformations. Maybe even some onomatopoeia, but they belong on the street. BOOM! WOOF! OUCH! BEYONCE FAILS AND FLOPS DOWN THE STREET WITH THIS NEW DOOKY SINGLE. KABOOSH! POW! BLAMMO! Lets be honest. You and me here. Reviewer and reader. This song is a masterpiece, stop questioning yourself. Beyonce may not be a goddess, but this song is damn near close to one of the best pop songs ever to hit the airwaves. Open your ears and absorb the noise, because it isn't some generic schlock. This isn't girl you got that yummy yummy or dance monkey monkey dance monkey dance or shaPPPe of Youuu or LETS MARVIN GAYE AND GET IT ON. This is Beyonce, this song is a classic. DON'T FORGET IT. The autistic nerd who finds immeasurable joy in overanalyzing every aspect of music in me says this is mediocre dance pop and not much more, but this is one of the extremely rare occasions where that voice doesn’t take precedence in my brain. Everything about my taste in music dictates that I should be bored to tears by this track, but for some reason, I think it kinda fucks. I kinda dig the frustrated lyrics that exasperatedly spell out how the target of the song should’ve been forthcoming about how they felt. The vocal delivery is no question the best part of the track, and the electronic instrumental kinda goes hard. By all accounts I should feel nothing more than boredom and mild annoyance at this song, but I have an unexpected soft spot for it. Maybe it’s because it was on the radio in the car a ton when I was little. Either way, I am absolutely flabbergasted at the score I'm about to give this dumbass song. Feeling a light to decent 7 on this one. I'd sleep better at night having told the world I don't think this is a great song, but I'd be lying. Maybe it's because 21st century pop music seems to be, by and large, a cesspool of homogenized upbeat nonsense. Maybe it's because 99% of a singing lady and her ragtag team of writer/producers that actually do all the work" music from the last fifteen years is so much safer and stupider than this track. I mean, sure, the "message" of the track isn't great, but. take a big step backwards, think it over, and then tell me you don't have something in your music collection with a "message" you're not 100% in agreement with. Some of my favorite hip hop tracks of all time get fairly misogynistic and/or homophobic. Some of my favorite hyper-early acoustic blues tracks are about Jesus, a nice fella with a fairly groovy anti-authoritarian attitude who had some good things to say and lessons to teach. But I'm an atheist. My answer to the question "Do you believe Jesus was the son of God?" would probably be something like "No, I thought. it's Charles Grodin, isn't it? Isn't it Charles Grodin?" and then I'd feed on the waves of confused anger that ensue like a street dog who stumbles on a half-eaten chalupa and has the best fucking day EVER. But I'm not a lyrics guy. Never have been. So when this song grabs me by the ear and sits my ass down, the lyrics have nothing to do with it. There's something about the production of this track that draws me in. A sort of "big starkness," wherein it's not an underproduced-sounding track by any means, but there's SO much more breathing room in the mix than any Katy Perry, Rihanna, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, Katy Gaga, Lady Swift, or Tyler Perry track I've ever heard. There's more it isn't doing than it is. At least 80% of the track's meat is the vocals and the drums. No absurdly loud synth lines pulled straight from trance. No "the chorus is exactly the same as the verse, only louder" gimmick. No hooks that sound like they came from The Complete Idiot's Guide To Writing Pop Hits book that everyone else seems to be using. The bridge isn't great, but they use it once and it's brief. And the melody shift in the chorus (the bit you hear for the first time at 0:50) to an augmented chord and back down. that's not a pop shift. It's menacing. The resolution back to E is pure pop, but it's one measure (maybe even a half-measure) of an eight measure chorus. There's a lot of melodic pandering in pop music. The deeper you go down the music theory rabbit hole, the harder it gets to ignore the three or four chord progressions that most pop songs use. But this? This doesn't even HAVE a chord progression. You don't need one when you're operating on rhythm. The best James Brown tracks have all the melodic development of an old CRT television that won't stop humming, but that's the whole point. They're not operating on memorable chord changes. Your legs don't give a shit about memorable chord changes. And if this ain't legs music, I dunno what is. Votes are used to help determine the most interesting content on RYM. Vote up content that is on-topic, within the rules/guidelines, and will likely stay relevant long-term.
Single ladies release date